svētdiena, 2017. gada 15. oktobris

A way to get rid of political simple-mindedness


             Longum iter est per praecepta, breve et efficax per exempla
        



A way to get rid of political simple-mindedness
                                                        
    Manipulation of the minds of voters and imposition on them of the non-alternative worldview of the powers that be is ensured through the sophisticated agitation, total propaganda and disinformation disseminated by the mass media which are controlled by the state. Most people succumb to this and accept the views of political leaders as unconditionally truthful ones, without even seeing, without trying or being unable to notice the discrepancy between their words and deeds.
     This way, compliance with the authoritarian diktat is successfully achieved and ignorance in voters is maintained, making them subdued weak-willed beings.
    To break out of all this and change this condition that undermines the human dignity, it is necessary to look for non-trivial methods, it is necessary to create effective opportunities to bring enlightenment into society. Doing this in a way which is acceptable, simple and understandable to people. ... Read more: https://www.amazon.com/HOW-GET-RID-SHACKLES-TOTALITARIANISM-ebook/dp/B0C9543B4L/ref=sr_1_1?crid=19WW1TG75ZU79&keywords=HOW+TO+GET+RID+OF+THE+SHACKLES+OF+TOTALITARIANISM&qid=1687700500&s=books&sprefix=how+to+get+rid+of+the+shackles+of+totalitarianism%2Cstripbooks-intl-ship%2C181&sr=1-1
    

AI chatbot shows promise in talking people out of conspiracy theories

The imperturbable bot succeeds where humans usually fail, experiment finds

  • 12 Sep 2024

Personalized conversations with the “debunkbot” reduced people’s belief in conspiracy theories for up to 2 months.PeopleImages/iStock

You might know someone who thinks the Moon landing was faked or COVID-19 vaccines are full of microchips. Believers cling tenaciously to such conspiracy theories, which have little basis in reality, even when presented with contrary evidence. But according to research published today in Science, some people do change their minds when fact-based arguments are delivered by an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot instead of another human being. Personalized conversations with this “debunkbot” can turn even hardcore conspiracy theorists into budding skeptics, the researchers report.

“It’s really promising to see how AI can play a role in combating misinformation and conspiracy theories,” says Jan-Willem van Prooijen, a behavioral scientist at the Free University of Amsterdam who wasn’t involved in the new study. Generative AI is notorious for spreading falsehoods, most notably through the use of deepfakes, so Van Prooijen finds it “refreshing” to see it used as a force for good.

Be it the belief that the CIA assassinated former President John F. Kennedy or that Area 51 houses alien corpses, nearly half the U.S. population believes in one conspiracy theory or another, according to some estimates. Many psychologists think these beliefs help fulfill underlying psychological needs, such as the desire for security. But hypotheses about such “subterranean motivations” are hard to test, says Thomas Costello, a psychologist at American University and lead author of the new study. The new findings provide “one of the first really strong pieces of evidence that they’re not the whole story,” he says, “or maybe, in fact, that they’re totally wrong.”

Formas sākums

Formas beigas

When debating conspiracies in real life, believers will often attempt to overwhelm naysayers by quickly presenting as many arguments as possible—a technique known as the Gish gallop. Whereas no human can address all those claims at once, an AI program conceivably could. Costello and his colleagues wanted to know whether large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 Turbo, which process and generate huge amounts of information in seconds, could debunk conspiracy theories with what Costello describes as “tailored persuasions.”

The team recruited more than 2000 participants who professed a belief in at least one conspiracy theory, which they define as the belief that important events or situations—the Kennedy assassination or the COVID-19 pandemic—were secretly orchestrated by powerful people or organizations. Next, they had these people engage in a brief conversation with an LLM chatbot. Each person shared with the AI what they believed, the evidence they felt supported it, and rated how confident they were that the theory was true. The chatbot—trained on a wide range of publicly available information from books, online discussions, and other sources—refuted each claim with specific, fact-based counterarguments. These conversations reduced people’s confidence in their conspiracy theories, on average, by 20%.

These reductions were remarkably persistent, lasting up to 2 months, and appeared to work across a wide variety of theories. “The fact that it worked so well for so long is what stood out to me,” says Ethan Porter, a political scientist and disinformation researcher at George Washington University who wasn’t involved in the study.

Part of the reason debunkbot is so successful, Van Prooijen reasons, is that it remains “very polite,” whereas human conversations about similar topics can easily get “heated and disrespectful.” And whereas someone might worry about friends or family members judging them for altering their beliefs, it’s impossible to “lose face” in front of an AI model, he adds.

When Costello and his colleagues repeated their experiment with a chatbot that engaged with participants but didn’t formulate fact-based counterarguments, they saw no effect, suggesting the presentation of evidence was critical. “Without facts, it couldn’t do its job,” Costello says.

Still, the rhetoric involved may be critical to persuasion, says Federico Germani, a disinformation researcher at the University of Zürich. Because LLMs train on real conversations, he explains, they pick up on subtle rhetorical strategies that make their arguments more persuasive, even when a prompt has instructed them to rely purely on facts. “The authors are probably underestimating that, in between the lines, the AI is very good at manipulating,” he says.

Psychologists at the University of Kent, writing in a joint statement, also question whether the findings upend the prevailing idea that conspiracy theories fulfill unmet psychological needs. Aleksandra Cichocka, Robbie Sutton, and Karen Douglas say in a joint statement that because the study authors didn’t directly measure whether participants felt their needs were satisfied after conversing with the chatbot, it’s impossible to know whether that influenced their change of mind. Indeed, subjects were still quite confident in their theories even after the AI tried to debunk them, suggesting these underlying motivations still played a powerful role in their beliefs.

Although conspiracy theorists are unlikely to engage with debunkbot voluntarily, Germani and Van Prooijen note the AI could potentially bolster existing technological responses. Many social media sites already have strategies in place to flag potential misinformation, such as the Community Notes feature on X, and this new model could provide additional information refuting it.

People could also use debunkbot to quickly and thoroughly fact-check new claims they’ve heard, cultivating a healthy level of skepticism and making it less likely that they will fall down the misinformation rabbit hole in the future, Costello notes. “You can almost think of these chatbots as a form of epistemic hygiene,” he explains, “like brushing your teeth, but for your mind.”

https://www.science.org/content/article/ai-chatbot-shows-promise-talking-people-out-conspiracy-theories


The World According to Vladimir Putin                

A comic but ultimately alarming glimpse into the surreal world of Russian TV, from the Skripal poisoning to President Putin's hidden talent as a nightclub crooner…:

https://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-world-according-to-vladimir-putin/episode-guide


SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE …:

https://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/episodes

The ONION: America's Finest News Source.

www.theonion.com


News Thump  Seriously ripped Vladimir Putin denies Russian athletes use performance enhancing drugs

Russian athletes aren’t doping after all, says last surviving member of World Anti-Doping Agency team…:

The Daily Mash | satire
The Daily Mash (Великобритания): ну-ка, быстро проголосовали за меня, говнюки несчастные!


Donald Trump Is The Babylon Bee's Christian Of The Year 2019


For the second year in a row, The Babylon Bee is proud to present our coveted Christian of the Year award to Donald J. Trump…: https://babylonbee.com/news/donald-trump-is-the-babylon-bees-christian-of-the-year-for-2019

Tonight With Vladimir Putin (TV show)


Sometimes the most pointed social commentary is best delivered by a giant-eyed, blue-bodied, huggable cartoon character.

In just over two minutes, the animated short A Sad Little Fact asks tough questions about the future of truth itself. Do facts matter in a world where some politicians and pundits lie so regularly and without any accountability? The answer is—and must be—yes, but restoring a public debate grounded in truth is going to take time. And it’s going to require some challenging conversations.

There are big issues raised by this charming and accessible little short; questions that may not have simple answers. But with A Sad Little Fact, families, teachers, and friends have a new tool for starting a conversation that could not be more important.


Irresistible (ComedyDrama , 2020) «Честный кандидат»
A Democratic strategist helps a retired veteran run for mayor in a small, conservative Midwest town.
Director&Writer: Jon Stewart

Family Guy

Peter Griffin and his family of two teenagers, a smart dog, a devilish baby and his wife find themselves in some of the most hilarious scenarios

 Adult Education Meg gets married.


Picking up where the last episode left off, Brian and Stewie wonder what Meg has been up to since staying behind with Ivan in Russia. Although she enjoys her new life, she still misses some aspects of her old one, such as the food and decreased censorship. Following a brief health scare, Ivan refuses to be apart from Meg and proposes to her, which she accepts. However, when Meg admits her sadness at how her family missed her wedding, Ivan suggests that the two visit America for a proper goodbye. While walking away to call them, she overhears her husband gloating about how he was only using her for a green card marriage to get to the United States. As an act of revenge, Meg puts out several tweets under Ivan's name, criticizing the Russian way of life and getting him darted to death before walking out on him.

Meanwhile, Chris discovers that there are no pictures of him in the Adam West High yearbook, due to his lack of extracurriculars. At Lois' insistence, he tries out various clubs but none of them suit him. During a porn break at home, he soon discovers that some videos are shot at his own school, and he confronts Principal Shepherd about this. Noting how badly-made the videos are, Chris offers his directing services to help him improve it, in exchange for extracurricular credit. While the scheme works out at first, Chris and Shepherd are soon caught by Lois, who reports their actions to the school board. Chris talks everyone down by claiming that the porn was done to offset a constantly shrinking school budget, and tells his mother that doing this was good for him since he is now aware of skills he didn't know he had. He nonetheless agrees to stop making porn, much to Lois' relief. https://familyguy.fandom.com/wiki/Adult_Education

 

From Russia With Love

Meg, Stewie and Brian go to Russia.  April 30, 2023

Despite his family's indifference, Brian goes on Instagram Live to hold a discussion about writing, but gains a very minuscule audience. Undeterred, Brian soon discovers that he's eligible to become a verified user, but Stewie notes that his new checkmark is green rather than blue, signifying that he's been hacked. With Meg's help, the two discover that the hacker is based in Chelyabinsk, Russia, and the trio agrees to head there to restore Brian's account. There, they meet the hacker, named Ivan, who quickly starts to hit on Meg. He also reveals that his life at home has been bleak, and that he only hacked Brian's Instagram so he could feel like he was living a good, American life. While the trio ultimately accomplishes their goal, Stewie and Brian are shocked to learn that Meg has decided to stay behind with Ivan, knowing that her unusual body is considered very attractive in Russia. The group parts ways, although Meg continues to keep in touch with her family.

Meanwhile, Quagmire drops by and invites Peter and Lois to a double date with a new woman he's met. The two agree, but Lois is shocked to see that Quagmire is dating her junior high school bully, Stephanie, who once pushed her into the water at a pool party back in the day. Stephanie manages to hit it off with the others, but Lois is unable to get over her middle school trauma, not helped by the humiliating stories being told about her. She remains on edge throughout the rest of the evening and then has a panic attack much like the ones she used to get, with even her body reverting to its awkward, teenage form. Lois is diagnosed with Severe Nerd Damage and must cope with it while attending a pool party at Joe's house; when she is shoved into the pool again, she is convinced that Stephanie hasn't changed. Stephanie reveals that she never bullied Lois and that the times she fell into the pool were both accidents. In fact, Lois' childhood imperfections were actually an inspiration for her, as she has since opened a foundation for kids with scoliosis. https://familyguy.fandom.com/wiki/From_Russia_With_Love



A Hopeful Story About a Sad Little Fact

TRUTH MATTERS

DECEMBER 04, 2019
BY SARAH MARGON

 Sometimes the most pointed social commentary is best delivered by an adorable, giant-eyed, blue-bodied, and huggable cartoon character.
In just over two minutes, A Sad Little Fact asks tough questions about the future of honesty and truth in an “alternative facts” world. How can we “save” facts when they are relentlessly under attack? Do facts matter in a world where some politicians and pundits lie so regularly and without any accountability? If facts matter, why, and to whom?
One person, unnamed in this animation, looms large off-screen. Since assuming office, U.S. President Donald Trump has made more than 13,000 false or misleading claims, according to the Washington Post, which has been tracking his lies. In an interview on Fox and Friends in late November, Trump made 18 false claims in a 53-minute interview, according to CNN (that’s one lie every 176 seconds). 
As Sacha Baron Cohen told the Anti-Defamation League last month, “There is such a thing as objective truth. Facts do exist.” The Holocaust happened. A man walked on the moon. Twenty-seven children were murdered at Sandy Hook elementary school. Russia hacked the 2016 elections in the United States.
When it comes to human rights, facts can be the difference between life and death. Here are a few recent examples: 
  • Jamal Khashoggi, a U.S. resident and Washington Post columnist who wrote about the Saudi Crown Price, walked into the Saudi Embassy in Ankara for a marriage license and never exited. Instead, he was brutally murdered by Saudi security services. 
  • Myanmar’s military used Facebook to spread hate and fuel a mass atrocity against the Rohingya people. 
  • A few U.S. lawmakers peddled the falsehood that the Open Society Foundations paid protestors and migrants. These lies directly inspired violence; pipe bombs were sent to homes of prominent Democrats. Twelve Jews were murdered at a Pittsburgh Synagogue. 
Since the current U.S. president took office, fact-checking has exploded. There are now more than 200 fact-checking organizations worldwide. Five years ago, there were 44.
Meanwhile, the president’s term “fake news”—which he uses to dismiss media outlets and stories with which he disagrees—has been embraced by repressive leaders around the world. Authoritarian leaders in a number of countries—including in Cambodia, Syria, and the Philippines—now use the term to target independent journalists and human rights activists. By using this term to reject the truth, these leaders entrench and promote fictitious narratives that serve their interests only. 
When President Trump leaves office, this problem won’t leave with him. Restoring a public debate grounded in truth is going to take time. That’s why it is important to tell this story in a way that is provocative for adults, but also can open up a conversation within communities—in an approachable way. 
The assault on facts makes addressing transnational problems like income inequality, migration, and climate change difficult and requires a united response from multiple countries.
I am often asked what can be done to push back against those who threaten basic freedoms, and seem intent on destroying the foundations of democracy. Looking for new ways to share facts and help them resonate with a wider audience so they are relatable to everyone is a tremendously important part of a much longer journey. Starting today, we have a new tool—one that can be used by families, teachers, and friends to start a conversation within their schools, neighborhoods, and communities about the importance of facts, and how we need them to uncover and support the truth.



C4 commissions ground-breaking documentary series Putin: A Russian Spy Story

Channel 4 has commissioned Rogan Productions to produce a ground-breaking three-part documentary series on Russian President Vladimir Putin. Filmed across Russia, America, Europe and the UK, this landmark series will show how Putin brought his knowledge of spy-craft to define the presidency of a nuclear power. Landing 20 years into his rule, this will be the definitive account of Putin’s power and how it has changed the modern world. …:


How Political Opinions Change

A clever experiment shows it's surprisingly easy to change someone’s political views, revealing how flexible we are
Our political opinions and attitudes are an important part of who we are and how we construct our identities. Hence, if I ask your opinion on health care, you will not only share it with me, but you will likely resist any of my attempts to persuade you of another point of view. Likewise, it would be odd for me to ask if you are sure that what you said actually was your opinion. If anything seems certain to us, it is our own attitudes. But what if this weren’t necessarily the case?
In a recent experiment, we showed it is possible to trick people into changing their political views. In fact, we could get some people to adopt opinions that were directly opposite of their original ones. Our findings imply that we should rethink some of the ways we think about our own attitudes, and how they relate to the currently polarized political climate. When it comes to the actual political attitudes we hold, we are considerably more flexible than we think.
A powerful shaping factor about our social and political worlds is how they are structured by group belonging and identities. For instance, researchers have found that moral and emotion messages on contentious political topics, such as gun-control and climate change, spread more rapidly within rather than between ideologically like-minded networks. This echo-chamber problem seems to be made worse by the algorithms of social media companies who send us increasingly extreme content to fit our political preferences.
We are also far more motivated to reason and argue to protect our own or our group’s views. Indeed, some researchers argue that our reasoning capabilities evolved to serve that very function.  A recent study illustrates this very well: participants who were assigned to follow Twitter accounts that retweeted information containing opposing political views to their own with the hope of exposing them to new political views. But the exposure backfired—increased polarization in the participants. Simply tuning Republicans into MSNBC, or Democrats into Fox News, might only amplify conflict. What can we do to make people open their minds?
The trick, as strange as it may sound, is to make people believe the opposite opinion was their own to begin with.
The experiment relies on a phenomenon known as choice blindness. Choice blindness was discovered in 2005 by a team of Swedish researchers. They presented participants with two photos of faces and asked participants to choose the photo they thought was more attractive, and then handed participants that photo. Using a clever trick inspired by stage magic, when participants received the photo it had been switched to the person not chosen by the participant—the less attractive photo. Remarkably, most participants accepted this card as their own choice and then proceeded to give arguments for why they had chosen that face in the first place. This revealed a striking mismatch between our choices and our ability to rationalize outcomes. This same finding has since been replicated in various domains including taste for jamfinancial decisions, and eye-witness testimony.
While it is remarkable that people can be fooled into picking an attractive photo or a sweet jam in the moment, we wondered whether it would be possible to use this false-feedback to alter political beliefs in a way that would stand the test of time.
In our experiment, we first gave false-feedback about their choices, but this time concerning actual political questions (e.g., climate taxes on consumer goods). Participants were then asked to state their views a second time that same day, and again one week later. The results were striking.  Participants’ responses were shifted considerably in the direction of the manipulation. For instance, those who originally had favoured higher taxes were more likely to be undecided or even opposed to it.
These effects lasted up to a week later. The changes in their opinions were also larger when they were asked to give an argument—or rationalization—for their new opinion. It seems that giving people the opportunity to reason reinforced the false-feedback and led them further away from their initial attitude.
Why do attitudes shift in our experiment? The difference is that when faced with the false-feedback people are free from the motives that normally lead them to defend themselves or their ideas from external criticism. Instead they can consider the benefits of the alternative position.
To understand this, imagine that you have picked out a pair of pants to wear later in the evening. Your partner comes in and criticizes your choice, saying you should have picked the blue ones rather than the red ones. You will likely become defensive about your choice and defend it—maybe even becoming more entrenched in your choice of hot red pants.
Now imagine instead that your partner switches the pants while you are distracted, instead of arguing with you. You turn around and discover that you had picked the blue pants. In this case, you need to reconcile the physical evidence of your preference (the pants on your bed) with whatever inside your brain normally makes you choose the red pants. Perhaps you made a mistake or had a shift in opinion that slipped you mind. But now that the pants were placed in front of you, it would be easy to slip them on and continue getting ready for the party. As you catch yourself in the mirror, you decide that these pants are quite flattering after all.
The very same thing happens in our experiment, which suggests that people have a pretty high degree of flexibility about their political views once you strip away the things that normally make them defensive. Their results suggest that we need rethink what it means to hold an attitude. If we become aware that our political attitudes are not set in stone, it might become easier for us to seek out information that might change them.
There is no quick fix to the current polarization and inter-party conflict tearing apart this country and many others. But understanding and embracing the fluid nature of our beliefs, might reduce the temptation to grandstand about our political opinions. Instead humility might again find a place in our political lives.

Tuesday 17 March 2020 by Davywavy
Vladimir Putin reluctantly agrees to quarantine himself inside the Russian President’s office until at least 2036

Vladimir Putin has sadly announced he has no choice but to self-isolate in the President’s office for as long as necessary – possibly years, if not decades.
Putin, who it was feared might have to come out of the office and mingle with ordinary people at the end of his term, is understood to have made the decision on the advice of experts who knew they’d better not advise him to do anything else.
“Expert advice is for people to quarantine themselves for the good of others, and so there really isn’t any greater good than me staying right here for a long, long time to come,” Putin said in a statement to the Russian public.
“Of course, there are piddling little things like laws and the constitution to consider, but what are they when there are important things like my wellbeing at risk?
“I will always do what is best for the Russian people, as I always have, and right now it appears that this is for me to stay right here, in the President’s office, until such time as the nation is completely healthy and free home any virus threats.
“Do not worry, I will definitely let everyone know when that day arrives.”
Taking another mouthful of caviar and popping his feet on the Presidential desk, Putin nodded to reporters over a web link.
He concluded, “Clearly it is for the best that I stay here for as long as necessary. Possibly forever. And you all agree with me, don’t you?”



FEBRUARY 1, 2020 8:56PM PT
‘Saturday Night Live’: Alec Baldwin Returns for ‘Judge Mathis’ Impeachment Court Sketch (Watch)



How self-deception allows people to lie:

https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20220525-how-self-deception-allows-people-to-lie

‘The Optimism Bias: A Tour of the Irrationally Positive Brain’,

 by Tali Sharot (Vintage, 2012)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11382184-the-optimism-bias  

Community of shitposters

that ridicule and expose Russian disinformation about the war in Ukraine, troll Russian diplomats and propagandists

https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3pd5y/shitposting-shiba-inu-accounts-chased-a-russian-diplomat-offline

Quick Calm Easy Meditations to Short-Circuit Stress Using Mindfulness and Neuroscience

 Jennifer R. Wolkin 

Do you ever feel like your stress levels are off the charts? You aren’t alone. Every day it feels like there’s something new to juggle or a fresh crisis to avert. And just keeping everything in the air requires an exhausting amount of attention and a dizzying amount of responsibilities. The more chaotic life becomes, the more we tend to forget what we truly value—from family and friends to mental and physical health. Fortunately, there are things you can do to stay grounded that won’t eat away at your increasingly precious time.
Quick Calm is a practical and fun guidebook designed to fit perfectly into a fast-paced lifestyle. You’ll discover the what, why, and how of developing your own mindfulness practice. You’ll learn all about the essential, life-affirming benefits of this ancient practice, including mindfulness meditation’s positive effects on both mind and body. And, most importantly, you’ll find daily practices you can do in just five minutes a day!
So, if you’re ready to discover the gift of mindfulness, but you don’t have the time to attend a meditation retreat, set aside five minutes a day with this handy little guide. You’ll be hard pressed to find a better return on your time investment! : 
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/54670255-quick-calm 

Seven and a Half Lessons About the Brain

Lisa Feldman Barrett

Seven short essays (plus a bite-sized story about how brains evolved) reveal lessons from neuroscience research. Questions like these in any order:
1 where brains came from
2 how they’re structured (and why it matters)
3 how yours works in tandem with other brains to create everything you experience
4 dismiss popular myths
5 idea of a “lizard brain”
6 the alleged battle between thoughts and emotions
7 between nature and nurture
1/2 to determine your behavior

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/48930266-seven-and-a-half-lessons-about-the-brain   

Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters

Steven Arthur Pinker

In Rationality, Pinker rejects the cynical cliché that humans are simply an irrational species - cavemen out of time fatally cursed with biases, fallacies and illusions. After all, we discovered the laws of nature, lengthened and enriched our lives and set the benchmarks for rationality itself. Instead, he explains, we think in ways that suit the low-tech contexts in which we spend most of our lives, but fail to take advantage of the powerful tools of reasoning we have built up over millennia: logic, critical thinking, probability, causal inference, and decision-making under uncertainty. These tools are not a standard part of our educational curricula, and have never been presented clearly and entertainingly in a single book - until now.

Rationality matters. It leads to better choices in our lives and in the public sphere, and is the ultimate driver of social justice and moral progress. Brimming with insight and humour, Rationality will enlighten, inspire and empower.
'A terrific book, much-needed for our time' Peter Singer  
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/56224080-rationality  

Куклы пророческая серия. Путин 20 лет спустя


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=of2AX_PQi-s

Жанр политической сатиры и пародий:

Максим Галкин про Украину и политику Новосибирск 20 19…: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTe-9M0CwtE&feature=player_embedded

Мультфильм про Путина "Мальчиш Обнулиш"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyI93Gu81kM

Эхо гойды. Непризнанные референдумы

Кто взорвал потоки – "Заповедник", выпуск 234

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N34nZeVjlPk

Праздник военкома. Границы закрыты. Референдумы на отжатых территориях – "Заповедник", выпуск 233

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyV_1JbnW_s

Список Мединского. Культура отмены. Признаки военного положения в России – "Заповедник", выпуск 211

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDRJp2gFqR8

Nav komentāru:

Ierakstīt komentāru